ENAS 880...Imaging Drugs in the Brain |
Fall 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syllabus in Progres |
|
KEY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
means "tentative" |
|
|
|
|
|
means: skim whole
paper and write 2 questions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
means: no synopsis required - specific sections to
be read |
|
|
|
|
|
|
means: no synopsis required but MUST READ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
means : watch this video and write
an entertaining movie review |
|
|
|
|
|
|
means: write a snappy press release |
|
DATE |
room |
Lect |
TOPIC |
ARTICLES |
|
|
Supporting docs |
|
INSTRUCTOR(s) |
|
8-Sep |
SHM I 304 |
1 |
introduction to PET (and fMRI)
and neuroreceptor imaging AND BASIC NEUROCHEM |
Morris,Lucas,Cosgrove |
Reward
Circuitry |
Poldrack |
|
|
|
Morris/Hampson/Cosgrove |
|
|
|
|
� |
|
|
|
|
15-Sep |
SHM I 304 |
2 |
PET METHODS 1: imaging dopamine receptors, drugs |
Wagner
1983 |
Farde
1986 |
Koob
& Volkow 2010 |
|
|
|
Morris |
|
|
|
|
22-Sep |
SHM I 304 |
3 |
fMRI METHODS 1: fMRI
basics/comparison to PET |
Bennett
2009 |
Shaywitz
2005 |
Biswal
1995 |
Poldrack |
|
|
Hampson/Cosgrove |
|
|
29-Sep |
SHM I 304 |
4 |
PET METHODS 2: imaging dopamine
changes (displacement) |
Logan
1991 |
Morris
1995 |
Koepp
1998 |
|
|
Fisher
1995 |
|
Morris |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early October |
|
individual feedback on class
participation and synopses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-Oct |
TAC N205 |
5 |
PET METHODS 3: equilibrium vs
bolus designs / DESIGN-A-THON ? |
Carson
2000 |
Sullivan
et al 2013 |
Sandiego
et al 2013 |
Morris,Lucas,Cosgrove |
|
Kreisl 2010 |
|
Morris |
|
|
|
|
|
(review pgs 113-118) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Oct |
SHM I 304 |
6 |
PET METHODS 4: neuroinflammation |
Sandiego
2015 |
Owen
20101 |
|
Cosgrove |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20-Oct |
SHM I 116 |
7 |
fMRI METHODS 2: Functional
connectivity |
Hampson
2006 |
Wang
2014 |
Krishnan-Sarin
2007 |
|
Fox+Raichle
2007 |
|
Hampson/M/C |
|
|
|
|
|
(NOTE ROOM CHANGE) |
|
will use for mini design-a-thon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27-Oct |
SHM I 304 |
8 |
APPLICATION 1: alcohol induced
dopamine (prediction error) DESIGN-A-THON |
Yoder
2009 |
Urban
2010 |
Kareken
et al, 2010 |
|
Morris/C/H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-Nov |
SHM I 304 |
9 |
APPLICATION 2: smoking/imaging
nic receptors w SPECT, (sex diffs) |
Cosgrove
2009 |
Brody
2011 |
|
M/Cosgrove/H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-Nov |
SHM I 304 |
10 |
APPLICATION 3: smoking/dopamine
study comparison -- In Class Team Quiz |
Brody
2004 |
Barrett
2004 |
Li
et al 2012 |
|
Lucas
2013 |
|
M/C/H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17-Nov |
SHM I 304 |
11 |
MOVIE
REVIEWS(2), PRESS RELEASE: sex differences, smoking |
Morris 2013 |
Cosgrove
2014 |
Hampson
2012 |
|
|
M/C/H |
|
|
|
moview
review assignment description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M/C/H |
|
24-Nov |
� |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hampson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final |
|
*** |
Final assignment: choose
an imaging paper you like. One we did not read. Write a synopsis. Then write a nice 1-2
page argument for why we should add it to the
syllabus. |
|
Hampson/Morris/Cosgrove |
|
� |
|
|
|
Due by end of finals week. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are the movie reviewer! |
|
|
|
|
You are the press agent! |
|
|
KEY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
means "tentative" |
|
|
|
|
means:
skim whole paper and write 2 questions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
means: no
synopsis required - specific sections to be read |
|
|
|
|
means: no synopsis required but MUST READ |
|
|
|
|
|
means : watch this video and write an entertaining movie
review |
|
|
|
|
|
means: write a snappy press release |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Removed Lectures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
short-lived dopamine release/smoking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
obesity fMRI v PET |
Wang
2000 |
Stice,
2008 |
Cosgrove ? |
|
|
Wang,Volkow
2008 |
|
|
|
additional obesity paper |
Eisenstein 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
basics of fMRI |
Clare
2009 |
Poldrack
2009 |
Buxton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
supplementary
material |
Ernst
1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
conectivity |
Hong
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
PAR-12-267 |
|
|
|
|
2.
FDA/CTP priorities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|